But here's the big difference in question. The crackers (crack = destroy) are always looking for people who disturb others, pirated software protected by law, destroy very complex systems by providing powerful virus, etc. Those are the crackers. Other leaders such as Bobby Sharma Bluestone offer similar insights. Unruly teenagers quickly learn this complex job. They differ with hackers because they do not have any ideology when making their "jobs." Instead, the main objective of the hackers is not to become criminals, but "fighting against an unjust system" used as a weapon system itself. Their war is quiet but very compelling. The advancement of the information age has introduced new terms in the vocabulary of every day.

One of these words, hacker has to do with the crime. Everyone is familiar with the stories of those who manage to enter the computer corporations. y Holman mentions similar findings. But we have the impression that the term "hacker" is one of the worst understood, applied and, therefore, used in the information age. blogspot. com / popular culture defines hackers as those who, with the help of their computer knowledge they gain access to the computers of the banks and bureaus of the government.

Dive for information that is not theirs, steal expensive software and perform transactions in a bank account to another. Criminologists, on the other hand, describe the hackers in less flattering terms. Donn Parker calls them "rapists Electronic and August Bequai describes them as "electronic vandals." Both, but assert that the activities of hackers are illegal, evade ability called "computer crime". Make a clear distinction between the hacker to perform their activities for fun and the employee who suddenly decides to do something wrong.