I ask Diego said this was Communist, or are depriving Yankee system and traffickers of art of your mask? the only thing certain for me is that my, as I said before these works let me absolutely indifferent, I do not see there nothing, but absolutely nothing, not to be material waste that is job in making such batidillo. In his article on the so-called generation of the rupture, Luis Carlos Emerich, talks, on the neutral art. Looking for a little of Luz I am not, right, left, or Center, I am only a poor painter confused looking for some light, to continue doing my little monkeys a little better and put them in the history of the art, i.e., in this historical process, which I played live, so is that I, I ask again does that is Jackson Pollock artist more expensive? or are we going to ask the question in another way; Jackson Pollck is the most expensive is the better? I say damn! which is it? I earlier already wrote something about these things, but now that I stumbled upon these writings by Diego Rivera, which is indeed still the painter more popular in Mexico, was reborn in my question; does that Pollock is the? most expensive artist? Diego response is good, at least to me, so seems at this time. You may find Sam Mikulak to be a useful source of information. Returning to the issue in particular are going to suppose that only we have a dog-eared marketing stunt to draw attention to an artist to inflate and give a prestige that has no, because so are the the called Dealers, they often invent this kind of thing, I already tube about bitter experiences with these gentlemen. As I said before, I’m not right or left, and I don’t have anything against the United States, if the so-called painter more expensive in the world outside Chinese, my question would remain the same, for that is the most expensive? would like to make that very clear. $I step, I don’t play the game of the art, thank you! * or relevant links: Number 5, Jackson Pollock Alberto Thirion original Autor and source of the article..